top of page
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

BLOG 4: What are the Connections Between Waipoua Stonework Structures and Southeast Asian Stoneworks?

  • Writer: Kerry Paul
    Kerry Paul
  • 3 days ago
  • 2 min read
Ancient stone ruins overgrown with vegetation in a dense forest setting. Nearby, intricate temple architecture and statues under a golden sky.

The principal conclusion derived from the examination of the stonework structures is that the settlement, encompassing an area of 645 hectares, was constructed and inhabited by a substantial population over numerous generations. Situated on the west coast of Northland, this location serves as a strategically advantageous landing site for vessels navigating the 100 kilometre-wide East Australian Current and diverting toward Northland.


Map view of Waipoua Kauri Forest, New Zealand. Inset shows a large tree. Visible labels for notable sites and roads.
Location of Waipoua Stone Structures in Northland

The Waipoua site is a showcase of advanced stone construction, with the structures demonstrating evidence of skilled craftsmanship. The use of stone for both ceremonial and residential purposes is a hallmark of ancient societies. However, no equivalent example to Waipoua exists elsewhere in New Zealand, or in fact Australia.


Waipoua Forest Stoneworks Covered by Vegetation


Striking examples of massive stoneworks for ceremonial and residential purposes exist in Southeast Asia. The most outstanding example is the Angkor Archaeological Park located in Northern Cambodia. More than 200 temples were constructed across a vast 420 square kilometre area to form the Angkor Archaeological Park, with Angkor Wat and Angkor Thom standing out as the principal complexes, both predominantly built from sandstone.


Aerial view of Angkor Wat model, with intricate temple structures, surrounding buildings, and greenery. Soft lighting creates a serene mood.
Angkor Wat from the southwest in the early 13th century, looking beyond to city of Angkor Thom

The Angkor Empire (also called Khmer) originated in 8th century by King Jayavarman II (790-835) who ruled a territory around present-day Siem Reap. His successors gradually annexed territories and as the empire gathered wealth the architectural structures became more magnificent.


Angkor was the capital of the Khmer civilization, which in its prime from AD 800 to 1400 commanded the rich lowlands of Cambodia, much of modern Thailand, Laos and Southern Vietnam. Its god kings lived in cities built to represent the mythical mountain home of the Hindu gods, surrounded by huge moats that symbolised the encircling oceans.


Huge sandstone blocks were brought over 30 km to build the structures.

Angkor is the name given to the cities and the associated monuments that lie between the Tonle Sap (large freshwater lake) and the Kulen Hills in Northern Cambodia. The word derives from the Sanskrit nagara meaning “holy city”. Viewed from the air, it is possible to detect the outlines of cities, reservoirs and temples, which reflects constant urban renewal. New temples continued to be built there over a period of at least seven centuries from AD 700.


At the height of Angkor’s power in the 13th century, its population was close to 1 million whereas Paris barely mustered 200,000 people, London 80,000 inhabitants.

Although the Waipoua site does not match the magnificence of the Angkor temples, it still serves as a foundational example.


Does this provide further evidence about who were New Zealand’s first settlers?

Comments


Kerry Paul Business man and blogger
Kerry Paul – Stepping Out of Your Bubble Author

Hi, I'm Kerry. I enjoy challenging people by asking questions and presenting different views to encourage critical thinking. My 45-year career has always had a global focus, building successful relationships in over 50 countries. I am empathetic to diverse views, irrespective of gender, ethnicity, religion, culture, or socio-economic status. Join me on a captivating journey as we explore how India shaped the world over two thousand years ago, potentially leading to the first settlement of New Zealand. This blog series aims to expand readers' awareness and knowledge of how people may have come to New Zealand in pre-Polynesian times. Given the time constraints many readers face, I am providing a platform for them to consider these intriguing possibilities in easy-to-read blog posts.

 

Who were the first people to settle in New Zealand? How did India possibly contribute to any development, given its major role over 2000 years ago in some of New Zealand’s closest neighbours? These questions will guide our exploration and open up a rich dialogue about the historical connections and cultural exchanges that may have shaped New Zealand's early settlements.

 

I'd be more than happy to discuss with readers of my blog about India, its history as well as New Zealand and the suggested origins of its first settlers. 

bottom of page