top of page
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

16. What can we learn about New Zealand's first settlers from the archaeological excavation at Poukawa, near Hastings?

  • Writer: Kerry Paul
    Kerry Paul
  • Jun 13, 2025
  • 3 min read

Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Archaeological Artefacts

1.1 Artefacts Recovered from a Dig at Poukawa


In 1930, professional surveyor Russell Price conducted a survey at Poukawa, 20 km south of Hastings, to construct a canal outflow for Lake Poukawa. The goal was to provide flood protection and reclaim land for pasture. During the excavation of the drainage channel, Price discovered leg bones of moa standing upright in the soil—without torsos or heads.

Two men sit on an archaeological excavation site with dug-out steps, surrounded by piles of earth. The scene is monochrome.
Richard Price Excavation Site, Poukawa, Hawkes Bay, 1965

Intrigued, he hypothesized that this was evidence of moa hunters and returned to search for further proof. He conducted exploratory digs in 1956 and carried out a detailed excavation in 1962, reporting his findings to the New Zealand Archaeological Association in 1963. Price was assisted in his excavations by scientists from the University of Auckland and the DSIR (Department of Scientific and Industrial Research).


Price uncovered fragmented moa bones and stone tools made from black stone and red quartz, materials not found in the region. Two layers of volcanic ash provided immediate clues to the age of the artefacts. The upper layer was from the Taupō eruption in 186 AD, while the lower band originated from the Waimihia eruption (an earlier Taupō eruption) around 1400 BC. Artefacts found beneath these volcanic ash layers indicated human presence prior to the eruptions, as volcanic ash typically seals everything beneath it.

Map showing ash distribution from Taupo AD 186 eruption. Concentric rings indicate ash depth. Inset highlights Taupo Volcanic Zone.
Taupō Eruption 186 AD

In 1964, soil scientist Allan Pullar (DSIR) joined Price in further analysis. Charcoal and pollen samples collected from beneath the ash layers led them to conclude that human beings had been present in New Zealand for at least 3,300 years.


Despite their findings, the conclusions were challenged and not widely accepted. The reasons for this opposition remain debatable. However, several practical arguments support the presence of human habitation prior to 1280 AD:


  1. The estimated population of moa in New Zealand around 1300 AD ranged from 58,000 to 2.5 million.

  2. By 1440 AD—just 150 years later—all nine species of moa were estimated to be extinct.

  3. Given that early Māori settlers arrived in relatively small numbers, primarily in the upper North Island, it would have taken multiple generations for their population to grow enough to hunt moa to extinction across the entire country.

  4. The rapid extinction of moa suggests that New Zealand must have been inhabited by significant numbers of humans well before 1300 AD.


These statements raise a series of questions:

If moa numbers were of this scale in 1300 AD and there were relatively few Maori spread around the country, then why did the birds become extinct in 150 years?


Were there large numbers of inhabitants in New Zealand long before the arrival of the Maori and they were largely responsible for the moa becoming extinct? Who were New Zealand's first settlers?


A series of videos by Martin Doutre explores the work of Richard Price and the controversy surrounding his findings. For those interested in an in-depth study of this topic, the following links provide further information:


Video Series on Richard Price's Discoveries:


Which archaeological artefacts found in New Zealand have origins that remain uncertain or subject to debate? Can you identify any?





Kerry Paul Business man and blogger
Kerry Paul – Stepping Out of Your Bubble Author

Hi, I'm Kerry. I enjoy challenging people by asking questions and presenting different views to encourage critical thinking. My 45-year career has always had a global focus, building successful relationships in over 50 countries. I am empathetic to diverse views, irrespective of gender, ethnicity, religion, culture, or socio-economic status. Join me on a captivating journey as we explore how India shaped the world over two thousand years ago, potentially leading to the first settlement of New Zealand. This blog series aims to expand readers' awareness and knowledge of how people may have come to New Zealand in pre-Polynesian times. Given the time constraints many readers face, I am providing a platform for them to consider these intriguing possibilities in easy-to-read blog posts.

 

Who were the first people to settle in New Zealand? How did India possibly contribute to any development, given its major role over 2000 years ago in some of New Zealand’s closest neighbours? These questions will guide our exploration and open up a rich dialogue about the historical connections and cultural exchanges that may have shaped New Zealand's early settlements.

 

I'd be more than happy to discuss with readers of my blog about India, its history as well as New Zealand and the suggested origins of its first settlers. 

bottom of page